The first Bill 168 Ontario arbitration decision was made in the matter of Kingston (City) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 109 (Hudson Grievance), providing an insight into how Bill 168 amendments function in the workplace and how they may be used to terminate an employee.
Read More...In Reichard v. Kuntz Electroplating Inc. the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that an employer may terminate a manager for cause if the managerâ Read More...
In Systad v. Ray-Mont Logistics Canada Inc. the British Columbia Supreme Court found that an employee who underwent knee surgery two months after bein Read More...
The first arbitration decision provides well needed insight into how the Bill 168 amendments are to function in the workplace and how they may be used Read More...
On Aug. 18, 2011, the first Bill 168 arbitration decision was made in the matter of Kingston (City) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 109, Read More...
A Bill 168 arbitration decision was made in the matter of Kingston (City) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 109 (Hudson Grievance) which pr Read More...
Employers are obligated to act in good faith and fair dealing in the course and manner with which they carry out employee dismissals. An employer’s Read More...
In constructive dismissal, an employee may be able to treat the employment contract as being at an end, which entitles the employee to notice from the Read More...