Court Awards $57,740 in Punitive Damages After Employer Delays ESA Payments

Delaying statutory termination payments can expose employers to significant liability, including punitive damages, not just an order to pay what should have been paid in the first place

When an employment relationship ends, employers are required to pay statutory termination entitlements on time and in full. A recent Ontario decision is a strong reminder that delaying these payments, or treating them as leverage in negotiations, can create serious exposure.

In Carroll v. Oracle Canada ULC, 2025 ONSC 4889, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded $57,740.55 in punitive damages after Oracle delayed paying commissions that were owed during the statutory notice period.

What Happened

The employee, Steve Carroll, was terminated as part of a restructuring. Oracle initially paid statutory termination amounts based on base salary but did not include the employee’s commission entitlement during the ESA notice period.

Oracle eventually paid the withheld commissions, but only eight months later, and the Court was not satisfied with the explanations offered.

The Court’s Message: ESA Entitlements Are Not a Negotiation Tool

Justice Koehnen found Oracle’s conduct unacceptable and concluded that the failure to pay the commission amounts on time, and the prolonged delay without a credible justification, amounted to a breach of good faith. The Court viewed the delay as an effort to pressure the employee into a worse settlement position.

This matters because courts reserve punitive damages for exceptional circumstances, where conduct is harsh, high-handed, or undermines the integrity of the employment relationship, especially at termination when employees are often at their most vulnerable.

Why Punitive Damages Were Awarded

The Court awarded punitive damages equal to the amount that was wrongfully withheld, specifically $57,740.55, as a direct denunciation of the conduct and to deter other employers from doing the same thing. Put simply, Oracle’s delay did not just create liability for the unpaid amount, it triggered an additional penalty of the same size.

A Reminder About “Hardball” Severance Tactics

Ontario courts have long criticized termination conduct that is misleading, insensitive, or designed to take advantage of the power imbalance that exists at the end of employment. This decision is a modern example of a court using the duty of good faith to regulate employer behaviour during the termination process.

Employers Risk Losing Ability to Rely on Termination Clause

There is an additional issue employers should keep in mind. When an employer fails to meet statutory obligations under the ESA (or the termination obligations set out in an employment contract), that failure can sometimes become part of an argument that the employer has undermined its ability to rely on termination language, potentially exposing the employer to common law reasonable notice. This risk is fact-specific, but it is one more reason to get the basics right at the time of termination.

Practical Takeaways

For Employers

Pay ESA entitlements correctly and on time, including required earnings components like commissions where applicable.
Avoid using statutory minimums as bargaining leverage, courts may treat this as bad faith.
If you discover an underpayment, correct it promptly, document the reason, and communicate clearly.

For Employees

Do not assume the numbers are correct, especially where compensation includes commissions or variable pay.
Do not sign a release under pressure, get advice before agreeing to a package.
If statutory amounts are delayed or incomplete, that may strengthen your position.

Bottom Line

Carroll v. Oracle Canada is a clear warning that delaying statutory termination payments can expose employers to significant liability, including punitive damages, not just an order to pay what should have been paid in the first place.

How Minken Employment Lawyers (Est. 1990) Can Help

Whether you are an employer structuring workforce changes, or a professional navigating the aftermath of a layoff, Minken Employment Lawyers (Est. 1990) offers trusted guidance. With more than three decades of experience, our team helps employers and workers alike manage notice, severance, employment contract issues and restructuring risk.

If you’re facing job loss, negotiating severance, or preparing for operational changes that could impact staffing, contact Minken Employment Lawyers (Est. 1990) today for a confidential consultation at 905-477-7011 or contact@minken.com to connect with our team.

“Your Workplace is Our Business” ™

Sign up for our Newsletter to learn about new Employment Law legislation and Court decisions impacting your workplace.

Please note that this article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.